It’s the Poverty Stupid – Why we can’t ignore poverty while trying to improve education… especially for those in poverty.

First published in The Urban Times

University of Texas physics professor Michael Marder has made a most eloquent case for changing the debate about education reform in the US with a series of images. He has, sometimes literally, connected the dots between socioeconomic factors and measures of student learning in a way that champions of education reform such as Bill Gates, Michelle Rhee and David Guggenheim do not.

If you saw Guggenheim’s wildly popular film “Waiting for Superman”, you’re familiar with the paradigm of these self-appointed reformers.

The simple version is:

1. Public schools are bad.
2. If public schools have to compete with each other for students they will improve.
3. Giving families choices between traditional public schools and charter schools will create that competition.
4. Standardized test scores are the only way to measure and compare schools so families can choose the best schools.
5. Students will move from failing bad public schools to successful good charter schools.
6. All students will be in great schools and the US will once again be the education powerhouse that it once was.

I’ll call this the ‘corporate reform model’ since it sees schools as actors in a free market that must compete for customers (students) by producing the best product (test scores.)

The dangerous idea that free market competition – the corporate model- is the solution to the apparent crisis in public education is an intuitively attractive one. Waiting for Superman used viewers’ heartstrings and a bit of creative license (inaccuracies and reenactments portrayed as real-life moments) to drive the point home. Superman fans came away from the film thanking their lucky stars that tough district leaders like Rhee stand up to greedy teachers unions. They can find hope in Bill Gates’ involvement since his money along with that of the Broad and Walton foundations will fund the bulk of the push for more standardized testing and the creation of more charter schools to force public schools to improve or die. The only problem with this view is that it’s not true.

SAT Scores vs. Poverty Rate

As poverty rates increase, SAT scores plummet.

Continue Reading about why education can’t cure poverty, but curing poverty will change education at TheUrbanTimes

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Corporate Style Education Reform, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to It’s the Poverty Stupid – Why we can’t ignore poverty while trying to improve education… especially for those in poverty.

  1. Aaron Guile says:

    Thanks for posting this, I appreciate it.

  2. Anthony Cody had a recent blog showing similar graphs from Florida and Maine that show the correlation between poverty and school “report cards.”
    .
    http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2013/08/from_school_grades_to_common_c.html
    .
    In Wisconsin, the correlation chart is nearly identical. Slides 15 & 16 of the report show very strong correlation between poverty and performance.
    .
    http://news.dpi.wi.gov/files/eis/pdf/2013-15budg_dpipres2013-03-21.pdf
    .
    In Oklahoma, this blogger made the same connection with the new fangled grading system hitting that state.
    .
    http://okeducationtruths.wordpress.com/2013/04/11/a-f-report-cards-legislative-intent/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s